Silksong is an allegory to sustainability

CW: Basically 100% conclusion and heavy lore spoilers

So I was studying about sustainability and this came to my mind. Silksong implicitly calls out for a lot of sustainability concerns if you squint hard enough. I decided to squint harder and make the best list I could from the stuff I remember about Pharloom. It's kinda crazy, and makes you think.

Environmental Sustainability

Environmental Sustainability: doing the things we want now without harming the things future generations want to do

Economic Sustainability

Silksong is not much of a game about money, I have 5000 rosaries right now, but I'll try.

Social Sustainability

The Citadel made some pretty questionable social decisions. Pharloom has a lot of socially questionable creatures.


Environmental shows that the Citadel clearly didn't care about the world crumbling apart when expanding, they just wanted dominance or something and started growing indiscriminately like a cancer, which is obviously nonsustainable. Economic is just game design I guess. Social could be very deep if I dived into the lore, but from the list we can see that Pharloom has gone all over the place with sapient bugs commiting horrendous things to others, shunning, and the Citadel being an ass as always, which goes against the sustainability principle of well-being and equity. As I said in the last item, there is still good in this world, and therefore hope.

And Hornet couldn't do any of that without the help of many incredible bugs of Pharloom, which proves the last sustainability point: It only works if everyone is participating on it.

A lot of the things overlap with real converns in the real world, so, maybe, Team Cherry is warning us about something... Also, if you squint very very hard maybe you can see some imperialism in both games. Take this information as you wish. Goodbye and until next time!